Friday, August 25, 2006

"Who fired the first shot?" The cynical fraud swallowed.

Complete article is posted at: On the US-Israeli Invasion of Lebanon

From a recent article by Noam Chomsky

“The standard Western version is that the July 2006 invasion was justified by legitimate outrage over capture of two Israeli soldiers at the border. The posture is cynical fraud. The US and Israel, and the West generally, have little objection to capture of soldiers, or even to the far more severe crime of kidnapping civilians (or of course to killing civilians). That had been Israeli practice in Lebanon for many years, and no one ever suggested that Israel should therefore be invaded and largely destroyed.

Western cynicism was revealed with even more dramatic clarity as the current upsurge of violence erupted after Palestinian militants captured an Israeli soldier, Gilad Shalit, on June 25. That too elicited huge outrage, and support for Israel's sharp escalation of its murderous assault on Gaza.

The scale is reflected in casualties: in June, 36 Palestinian civilians were killed in Gaza; in July, the numbers more than quadrupled to over 170, dozens of them children.

The posture of outrage was, again, cynical fraud, as demonstrated dramatically, and conclusively, by the reaction to Israel's kidnapping of two Gaza civilians, the Muamar brothers, one day before, on June 24. They disappeared into Israel's prison system, joining the hundreds of others imprisoned without charge -- hence kidnapped, as are many of those sentenced on dubious charges.

There was some brief and dismissive mention of the kidnapping of the Muamar brothers, but no reaction, because such crimes are considered legitimate when carried out by “our side.” The idea that this crime would justify a murderous assault on Israel would have been regarded as a reversion to Nazism.”

1 comment:

Shine said...

After reading your Chomsky excerpt three times, I still can't understand the logic behind the point he is trying to make.

In other words, it doesn't make any sense, and seems to be blatant Israel bashing to me. Without referring to any context, or any outside sources other than his own biased perception, he is, in short, talking out of his ass.

There are plenty of anti-Israel sources and quotes out there, if you're going to jump on the anti-Israel bandwagon (for whatever personal reasons you have), at least do your homework.

And anyone who quotes Chomsky is obviously someone who doesn't do their thinking for themselves.