by a woman from Kerala, India who defended the people from Enron's energy grab!
"A FILM ABOUT HER WORDS."
"Raise less corn and more hell!" We print shotgun journalism, use "bad grammar" whenever possible and write with a short fuse from our farm in North Jefferson County, Kansas. Our slogan: "Hayseeds and bovines, unite! Stampede the clutterfreaks! Life is short!" Email us at: bluebarnnewscentral@gmail.com
Frankly, I'm not sure anyone from my generation should be saying anything
to your generation except, "We're sorry. We're really sorry for the mess you're
inheriting. We are sorry for the war in Iraq. For the huge debts you will have
to pay for without getting a new social infrastructure in return. We're sorry
for the polarized country. The corporate scandals. The corrupt politics. Our
imperiled democracy. We're sorry for the sprawl and our addiction to oil and for
all those toxins in the environment. Sorry about all this, class of 2006. Good
luck cleaning it up."
You're going to have your hands full, frankly. I don't need to
tell you of the gloomy scenarios being written for your time. Three books on my
desk right now question whether human beings will even survive the 21st century.
Just listen to their titles: The
Long Emergency: Surviving the Convergence Catastrophe; Collapse:
How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed; The
Winds of Change: Weather and the Destruction of Civilizations.
These
are just three of the recent books that make the apocalypse prophesied in the
Bible...the Revelations of St. John...look like child's play. I won't summarize
them for you except to say that they spell out Doomsday scenarios for global
catastrophe. There's another recent book called The
Revenge of Gaia that could well have been subtitled, "The Earth Strikes
Back," because the author, James Lovelock, says human consumption, our obsession
with technology, and our habit of "playing God" are stripping bare nature's
assets until the Earth's only consolation will be to take us down with her.
Before this century is over, he writes, "Billions of us will die and the
few breeding pairs of people that survive will be kept in the Arctic where the
climate remains tolerable." So there you have it: The future of the race, to be
joined in a final and fatal march of the penguins.
Every sensational theory about the future attracts pessimists and optimists, and
Peak Oil has futurists all over the map. Dr. Mark Jaccard is an economist
focusing on sustainable energy systems. A professor in the School of Resource
Management at Canada’s Simon Fraser University, Dr. Jaccard is author of a 2005
book, Sustainable Fossil Fuels: An Unusual Suspect in the Quest for Clean and
Enduring Energy (Cambridge University Press). Says he: “The doom-and-gloom
forecasts for gas, coal and oil are wrong…reports of the death of fossil fuels
are greatly exaggerated.” The professor opines that oil, gas, and coal will
still meet 58 percent of global energy needs by 2100.”
Daniel Yergin,
author of The Prize, his 1991 Pulitzer Prize-winning history of the oil
industry, rejects many of the theories that global production is about to tank:
“This is the fifth time we’ve run out of oil since the 1880s.” (USA Today,
10/16/05).
Walker mentions Hubbert, Deffeyes, Daniel Yergin, the Hirsch Report and other
big names. The problem is that this isn't analysis -- it's free-market
cracker-barrel wisdom, interspersed with quotes and anecdotes. Cracker-barrel
wisdom works well in stable periods of little change, but not at historical
inflection points. For business people and investors, Peter Tertzakian's recent
book "A Thousand Barrels a Second" is
a much better guide to the issues. Byron King who publishes
in Energy Bulletin is also an excellent source.
Our present system of energy is weakening our national security, hurting our
pocketbooks, violating our common values, and threatening our children's future.
Right now, instead of national security dictating our energy policy, our failed
energy policy dictates our national security. We would never leave 10 percent of
our military or intelligence assets vulnerable to an easy attack, but that's
what we've allowed to happen with oil.
Just one terminal in Saudi Arabia
handles about one out of every 12 barrels of the world's oil exports. That's
enough to trigger a new crisis beyond the scale of the 1970s, if it were cut
off. One terrorist attack has already been foiled there, and other threats have
been made.
Note that she has not offered to withdraw troops from Iraq,
but her speech does go into specific details on the creation of various funding
programs for energy research, including a windfall tax on the mega – profits
from Big Oil. However she is a long way from acknowledging the cataclysmic
potential of Peak Oil and the societal crisis it portends for “the American way
of life.”
The World is at a Critical Cross-roads
It is not Iran which is a threat to global security but the United States of America and Israel.
In recent developments, Western European governments --including the so-called "non-nuclear states" which possess nuclear weapons-- have joined the bandwagon. In chorus, Western Europe and the member states of the Atlantic alliance (NATO) have endorsed the US-led military initiative against Iran.
The Pentagon's planned aerial attacks on Iran involve "scenarios" using both nuclear and conventional weapons. While this does not imply the use of nuclear weapons, the potential danger of a Middle East nuclear holocaust must, nonetheless, be taken seriously. It must become a focal point of the antiwar movement, particularly in the United States, Western Europe, Israel and Turkey.
It should also be understood that China and Russia are (unofficially) allies of Iran, supplying them with advanced military equipment and a sophisticated missile defense system. It is unlikely that China and Russia will take on a passive position if and when the aerial bombardments are carried out.
The new preemptive nuclear doctrine calls for the "integration" of "defensive" and "offensive" operations. Moreover, the important distinction between conventional and nuclear weapons has been blurred..
The 2nd part of the complete article by Michel Chossudovsky is at: http://tinyurl.com/jps8g